Easy prediction (given current developments): Get ready for more, (organized) citizen actions such as this↓; ref. the (2014) video below. Those represented below -- plus many more -- have not "gone away". Nor will they...



(YT video link)

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
12/16 insert. (No affiliation.):



(YT video link)

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓(Previously written:)↓
Post-U.S. presidential election, 2016: Three items to (try to) keep front-and-center (article links below), if/when a U.S. administration generally hostile to the environment takes form. Off-site article links, no affiliation. New windows open:
http://time.com/4573414/climate-change-americas-cities/?


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/clean-energy-jobs-surpass-oil-drilling-for-first-time-in-u-s


http://www.lowcarbonusa.org/


**********************************************************************


5/4/16, Fort McMurray, Alberta, CN. (No affiliation with posting org.)

More info. here (off-site link): https://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurrayhttps://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurray

..Off-site news story excerpt (linked): "...Unseasonably hot temperatures combined with dry conditions have transformed the boreal forest in much of Alberta into a tinder box. Fort McMurray is surrounded by wilderness in the heart of Canada's oil sands..."

--> More about this (off-site article link, new window opens): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/science/global-warming-cited-as-wildfires-increase-in-fragile-boreal-forest.html?

More: (8/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4456011/california-wildfires-natural-disasters/?

More: (10/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4525178/climate-change-forest-fires/?

************************************************************************************************************************
************************************************************
7/26/16 off-site article link, new window opens:



*******************************************************************************
5/16: Hey...way, way more people check in with Jimmy Kimmel than this tiny blog. So, pls. have a listen (if you can get past Sarah...(Unnecessary bad language near the end of the video)):







(YT video link. No affiliation.)




***********************************************************************************************************

Climate change is not 'theoretical'. Effects are already occurring, in the United States. Today:

(Off-site 9/3/16 article link. New window opens. No affiliation:)



***************************************************************************************************





*******************************************************************************************************************

4/16 must-read: More fact than fiction...?

Off-site article link, new window opens: http://www.theonion.com/article/exxonmobil-ceo-relieved-it-finally-too-late-do-any-52732

**********************************************************************************************************************
3/16: Wake-up call ...yet another. ((If such projections are bolstered via add'l research:) Kids! 'Let's play pack-up and move to higher ground' (someday).):

(Off-site 3/30/16 article link, new window opens)

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/science/global-warming-antarctica-ice-sheet-sea-level-rise.html?

(3/31/16 editorial. Off-site link, no affiliation: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/opinion/the-danger-of-a-runaway-antarctica.html?)
************************************************************************************************************************


(↓Previous blog entries:)


(
Update (warning: contains facts/inevitable facts): 2015 is Earth's hottest year on record (off-site news article link).
2011-2015 is the warmest five-year period recorded (off-site article link).)
*******************************************************************************************************************************


(YT video link. No affiliation.)


>>>>Oh, please: ..How can puny mankind's activities possibly alter the Earth's environment..??




(YT video link)


...
on a global scale?? --> (one off-site link:) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141118-nasa-video-carbon-dioxide-global-warming-climate-environment/


***********************************************************

10/2015: 'Surprise'...Exxon understood about climate change -- through their own research -- back in the 1970s; supported misinformation about the concept for years after. Off-site 10/26/15 article link:


****************************************************************




(Related 11/30/15 article (link))


*****************************************************************************************


- "Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter
- "It is much easier at all times to prevent an evil than to rectify mistakes." - George Washington

- "97 percent of American scientists say that climate change is happening..." (link, new window)

- "Each of the last ten years features in the top 11 warmest years recorded in all [primary monitoring agency] datasets." (12/10 article link, table)

- "How hot was it? 2013 joins the top ten for temperatures..." (link)

- "... 'Flat Earth Society'? - Kerry slams climate change skeptics" (link)

- Risk management: "Even if it somehow could be determined that it is a coin flip -- 50/50 -- that 97% of climate scientists are (essentially) correct re climate change (link), don't present-day inhabitants (still) have the (moral) obligation to effectively address as much of the issue as is safely possible?
I.e.: Too great of a risk to future generations to ignore.. Or to paralyze with excessive deliberation." -- Anonymous



- "I'm not sure what the 'height of insanity' might be, but this seems a candidate: Modern, advanced societies ignoring - or deliberately distorting - principal findings of climate scientists -- who the same civilizations train and educate to become experts ..." (P.S. If it needs stating, we know what one of the 'rea$on$' (i.e., for denying) is...)
-- Anonymous





and,

- "...I have a better idea: do something, Congress. Do anything to help working Americans. Join the rest of the country. Join me, I'm looking forward to working with you...." --- President Barack Obama (7/2014)

9/2014: Also..."BP Plc Held Grossly Negligent for 2010 spill..."(article link). Appeals will be coming, but (if interested) you'll find a few older posts from a few years ago here, discussing the 'negligent ones' and certain attempts to deflect blame/responsibility.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Where's that American "can do" spirit right now??

Update, 4/8/09: I greatly appreciate Mr. Ted Anthony's brief comment in response to the following post, available for reading at the end. His point about attempting (as a journalist) to explain something, vs. assigning 'blame' is a good one. They are "different exercises". --- Mr. D. Tails

(My 4/6/09 post:)
From my reading of Mr. Ted Anthony's recent Associated Press 'Analysis' article (link)
"Analysis: Negotiating a minefield of bad news" . (Or, perhaps an alternate title; "Why are we killing each other?") :

The "analysis" primarily delves into the number and frequency of mass killings that are occurring in America, and possible causes. Mr. Anthony covers American culture for the Associated Press.

Included (in the article) from Binghamton, N.Y.'s Press & Sun Bulletin newspaper was this item, which REALLY bothered me:

"The Binghamton newspaper, the Press & Sun Bulletin, seemed to acknowledge the resignation in a glum editorial Saturday that wondered if it was simply, sadly, and inevitably Binghamton's turn to give up a few of its people to the juggernaut.

"It is our turn to grieve and to rally in support of those whose lives have been shattered," the newspaper said. "And it's our turn to hug those in our own families and wonder how a quiet, rainy Friday in a peaceful place became the setting for such a nightmare.""

It's our "turn"....?!? But as terrible as that is, I'm forced to agree about a couple of aspects.... but only these: It's difficult to head off or stop a determined human being, bent upon killing others, who is armed and has some type of plan. Also, viewed from a probability and statistics perspective, if your country has millions and millions of people (of all sorts), lots of available guns, and little effective control of deadly weapons....(Please refer to my previous posts, starting here.)

Reading further in Mr. Anthony's commentary/analysis story, I get the distinct impression that he's also(?) asserting that there's not much anyone can really do (about such mass shootings), and that modern American society is much to blame. ("This is not an era of good feeling in the United States" (e.g., the bad economy, terrorism, Iraq, etc.), and "People are tense.") And, above all, that: "....we seem powerless to stop it all...."

I strongly dispute assertions of utter "inevitability" and powerlessness. To begin with, that sure is the ol' "can do" spirit that helped make this country great (once): Just throw up our hands and consign all(?) past and future (mass) killings with guns to "inevitability".... There most definitely are things we can try to do, starting as individuals, to at least reduce the numbers and to increase our own chances of surviving. Here are just two: 1) Take seriously any threats or 'talk' from friends, co-workers, or relatives, seeming to indicate that they may be taking or planning such actions. Too often, someone close to an eventual killer was seeing signs of trouble, but failed to act. Err on the side of caution: Report it to police, clergy and/or try to get professional help to them. 2) Perhaps learn some of the following tactics, in case the worst happens to you: http://www.wikihow.com/Survive-a-School-or-Workplace-Shooting

Though he may in part be referring to what the primary subject of his specific article is (going to be), I still can't really fathom the beginning sentences of the following from Mr. Anthony (emphasized):
"Put aside for a moment the debate over guns. This isn't about policy. It's about asking the urgent question: What is happening in the American psyche that prevents people from defusing their own anguish and rage before they end the lives of others? Why are we killing each other?"
This AP writer himself starts off his piece by going through a fairly lengthy list of past, multiple killings in the U.S. And then: "More than 50 people dead in the past month in American mass shootings and their aftermaths." So, per Mr. Anthony (and everyone else except the N.R.A.) we clearly have a crisis in this country with (mass) killings with guns, but we're going to "put aside" a debate about guns? "And it isn't at least in part, about policy? How can any piece labeled 'analysis' of the issue totally omit these.....? That's one way to guarantee an assertion that we're all "powerless".

Once again (previous posts): Might not enacting/enforcing the following policies (laws) at least help the U.S. regain some control? Other "civilized" countries have not exhibited the awful degree of gun violence that ours has. Most feature serious controls: "Close the gun show loophole, ban military–style assault weapons, and limit the bulk sales of guns that feed illegal gun trafficking not only to Mexico, but from one state to another here at home..... Weak gun laws (in the U.S.) lead to easy access to dangerous weapons."


Here's a link to CBS's Katie Couric, who asks for additional constructive (and necessary) action. (After the dumb-ass commercial.) :


Watch CBS Videos Online

2 comments:

Ted said...

Thanks for this fascinating and excellent (and, yes, critical) post. My intention with that piece to which you refer was to start conversations about inevitability and the can-do spirit (which very much endures), and this is the kind of result that, for a writer, is really exciting to see.

I would add that I think attempting to explain something and placing blame are very different exercises. My intention as a journalist is always the former and never the latter.

I also appreciate the civility in your post.

Sincerely,


Ted Anthony

Anonymous said...

What you seem to miss is the fact that mass murder has been occurring since the days of the very first reported murder in the world: Cain and Abel (in which a rock was the assault weapon).

A gun is not required for an evil or crazy person to murder...they are simply the most convenient at the present time.

Guns also happen to be the most effective and convenient tools for us to use in defense against the criminal and murderous. As the basic fact that the vast majority of these incidents occur in venues where the victims were forcibly rendered defenseless demonstrates: removing that effective tool from the good guys rarely prevents the bad guys from doing their thing.

In the recent NY case in particular...the perpetrator barricaded the back entrance so that the victims had no means of escape. Once that was complete, he could have perpetrated his crime just as easily with gasoline and matches, bleach and ammonia, heck, a couple of big knives would have done the trick. And not one of the victims had the most effective means of self defense known to mankind available to stop him...meanwhile, after arriving at the scene two minutes after the call, the Police waited outside for an hour before entering because they didn't hear an "active shooter".

You keep repeating the same mantra without any identification of how your proposals will work to prevent murder, or even mass murder.

Close the misnamed "gun show loophole"? Criminals rarely obtain their guns from gun shows (less than 1% according to DOJ studies). The only instance of mass murder in my memory where the perpetrators can even be said to have indirectly obtained any of their guns from gun shows was columbine and they used a straw purchaser who would have been able to buy guns from any gun shop or licensed dealer had they so chosen.

"Military-style assault weapons" is a misnomer. What you are talking about is normal, every day semi-automatic rifles that have cosmetic features that some people don't like. As the first AWB demonstrated, no matter how strictly they are regulated, all that will happen is that the manufacturers remove as many of the cosmetic features they need to in order to no longer fit the definition, and then continue manufacturing the newly "non-military" rifles...that function exactly the same as the old scary ones. It's tantamount to trying to regulate fast cars by banning bucket seats, deck stripes and spoilers. It's just silly.

"Bulk sales" are already specifically reported to the ATF so that they can investigate whether that "bulk sale" had nefarious purposes. I probably wouldn't complain too much if true "bulk sales" were outlawed...meaning, say, more than ten guns at a time...heck, I probably wouldn't even complain about 5 guns at a time...but more than one gun a month is hardly a "bulk sale". And you're behind the curve on your "mexicans are getting their guns from the US" canard...that one has been thoroughly debunked.

The bottom line is that all of your proposals are directed at lawful gun owners and none of them have any hope of reducing crime or incidents like the recent spate of high profile incidents.

BTW: With the increasing unemployment rate, decreasing values of investment and retirement accounts, increasing national debt, the fed cranking up the printing presses which will inevitably lead to inflation, The government increasingly asserting itself into the private sector and supporting policies that will result in higher energy prices...which will, in turn, increase consumer prices across the board...many of the less stable among us are losing hope and losing heart. No matter what you try to do to curb it, these types of incidents are going to continue occurring and it's probably going to get worse before it gets better.

Hopeless, desperate people, turn to desperate measures. Your best bet is to be prepared to defend yourself should someone turn to desperate measures in your general vicinity.