Easy prediction (given current developments): Get ready for more, (organized) citizen actions such as this↓; ref. the (2014) video below. Those represented below -- plus many more -- have not "gone away". Nor will they...



(YT video link)

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
12/16 insert. (No affiliation.):



(YT video link)

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓(Previously written:)↓
Post-U.S. presidential election, 2016: Three items to (try to) keep front-and-center (article links below), if/when a U.S. administration generally hostile to the environment takes form. Off-site article links, no affiliation. New windows open:
http://time.com/4573414/climate-change-americas-cities/?


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/clean-energy-jobs-surpass-oil-drilling-for-first-time-in-u-s


http://www.lowcarbonusa.org/


**********************************************************************


5/4/16, Fort McMurray, Alberta, CN. (No affiliation with posting org.)

More info. here (off-site link): https://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurrayhttps://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurray

..Off-site news story excerpt (linked): "...Unseasonably hot temperatures combined with dry conditions have transformed the boreal forest in much of Alberta into a tinder box. Fort McMurray is surrounded by wilderness in the heart of Canada's oil sands..."

--> More about this (off-site article link, new window opens): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/science/global-warming-cited-as-wildfires-increase-in-fragile-boreal-forest.html?

More: (8/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4456011/california-wildfires-natural-disasters/?

More: (10/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4525178/climate-change-forest-fires/?

************************************************************************************************************************
************************************************************
7/26/16 off-site article link, new window opens:



*******************************************************************************
5/16: Hey...way, way more people check in with Jimmy Kimmel than this tiny blog. So, pls. have a listen (if you can get past Sarah...(Unnecessary bad language near the end of the video)):







(YT video link. No affiliation.)




***********************************************************************************************************

Climate change is not 'theoretical'. Effects are already occurring, in the United States. Today:

(Off-site 9/3/16 article link. New window opens. No affiliation:)



***************************************************************************************************





*******************************************************************************************************************

4/16 must-read: More fact than fiction...?

Off-site article link, new window opens: http://www.theonion.com/article/exxonmobil-ceo-relieved-it-finally-too-late-do-any-52732

**********************************************************************************************************************
3/16: Wake-up call ...yet another. ((If such projections are bolstered via add'l research:) Kids! 'Let's play pack-up and move to higher ground' (someday).):

(Off-site 3/30/16 article link, new window opens)

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/science/global-warming-antarctica-ice-sheet-sea-level-rise.html?

(3/31/16 editorial. Off-site link, no affiliation: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/opinion/the-danger-of-a-runaway-antarctica.html?)
************************************************************************************************************************


(↓Previous blog entries:)


(
Update (warning: contains facts/inevitable facts): 2015 is Earth's hottest year on record (off-site news article link).
2011-2015 is the warmest five-year period recorded (off-site article link).)
*******************************************************************************************************************************


(YT video link. No affiliation.)


>>>>Oh, please: ..How can puny mankind's activities possibly alter the Earth's environment..??




(YT video link)


...
on a global scale?? --> (one off-site link:) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141118-nasa-video-carbon-dioxide-global-warming-climate-environment/


***********************************************************

10/2015: 'Surprise'...Exxon understood about climate change -- through their own research -- back in the 1970s; supported misinformation about the concept for years after. Off-site 10/26/15 article link:


****************************************************************




(Related 11/30/15 article (link))


*****************************************************************************************


- "Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter
- "It is much easier at all times to prevent an evil than to rectify mistakes." - George Washington

- "97 percent of American scientists say that climate change is happening..." (link, new window)

- "Each of the last ten years features in the top 11 warmest years recorded in all [primary monitoring agency] datasets." (12/10 article link, table)

- "How hot was it? 2013 joins the top ten for temperatures..." (link)

- "... 'Flat Earth Society'? - Kerry slams climate change skeptics" (link)

- Risk management: "Even if it somehow could be determined that it is a coin flip -- 50/50 -- that 97% of climate scientists are (essentially) correct re climate change (link), don't present-day inhabitants (still) have the (moral) obligation to effectively address as much of the issue as is safely possible?
I.e.: Too great of a risk to future generations to ignore.. Or to paralyze with excessive deliberation." -- Anonymous



- "I'm not sure what the 'height of insanity' might be, but this seems a candidate: Modern, advanced societies ignoring - or deliberately distorting - principal findings of climate scientists -- who the same civilizations train and educate to become experts ..." (P.S. If it needs stating, we know what one of the 'rea$on$' (i.e., for denying) is...)
-- Anonymous





and,

- "...I have a better idea: do something, Congress. Do anything to help working Americans. Join the rest of the country. Join me, I'm looking forward to working with you...." --- President Barack Obama (7/2014)

9/2014: Also..."BP Plc Held Grossly Negligent for 2010 spill..."(article link). Appeals will be coming, but (if interested) you'll find a few older posts from a few years ago here, discussing the 'negligent ones' and certain attempts to deflect blame/responsibility.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

NFL Draft day comments re Browns

4:55pm - Cleveland Browns trade #5 pick to Jets, who then pick Mark Sanchez: 1) I think Sanchez will be an good or excellent NFL QB. (Hope he likes colder weather.) This is why I had the Browns considering him as my #2 probability (previous post.) 2) I also think Eric Mangini and the Browns 'cleaned up' (re their own, main objective), especially receiving S Abram Elam (who will start) and the Jets' #1 and #2 picks this year. (Don't know much about the other two Jets players also received, yet.) An excellent move; consistent with the #1 motive noted in previous posts here: Obtain additional picks to build the Browns. Also: A QB trade may happen for Cleveland, either this weekend or in the weeks ahead.

So who will the Browns take at #17? Part depends upon any additional trades (by the Browns) and, of course, what other teams before them do. However, look to see if either Clay Matthews III or Maualuga are available. M. Jenkins is still possible. Especially if they're trading Edwards, watch for J. Maclin (if available). In fact, if a WR the Browns like is still around, Edwards may likely be gone for something like a #2 and # 5. Aaron Maybin is also possible (if available.)
I'll guess right now that the more likely at the moment is a USC linebacker. We'll see....

5:50pm: Getting close to the Browns" #17 pick. Orakpo, Maybin, Jenkins now gone. Will San Diego go for Maualuga? If not, it may be hard for Cleve. to pass. Otherwise, I'll guess Clay Matthews. Beanie Wells and Jeremy Maclin are possibilities. Is Philadelphia interested in this pick?

6:05pm: Cleveland trades down to #19 with Tampa, who select QB Josh Freeman. Looks like Cleveland will still have a shot at either Maualuga or Matthews. Wells is going to be there, too. Maclin?

6:17pm: As guessed above, Philadelphia trades with Cleveland at #19. I'm hearing that Cleveland has received two #6's for the Tampa and Phila. moves. I would have hoped for slightly higher selections. Phila. takes Maclin. Detroit (#20) may go a USC linebacker. Cleveland will take the other one available (Matthews?). Wells? I think they need defensive help first. They may be able to get an RB a bit later.

6:28pm: Well. I (and others) talked about Mack a lot. I think it's too early for him, and I guess they didn't like the USC linebackers as much. Mack fills a need position, and he's smart. They must think they can get decent defenders at lower spots. Stay tuned.

6:59pm: Look like Green Bay has done the Cleveland draft that I (and others) were thinking about. Raji and Clay Matthews. But what do I know? A. Mack definitely help the Browns' O-line.
Notice that New England keeps trading down in this draft, too. And: The Edwards trade??

7:41pm: Cleveland looks like they now have three second round picks. Have to 'hit' on a couple of these. I think defenders are needed. Safeties Delmas and Chung are already gone. D. Butler and R. Maualgua are still there right now. I think it should be Maualuga, D. Butler, or maybe William Moore. B. Robiskie is still there. Edwards trade today still possible?

7:53pm: OK, Robiskie seems like a smart pick, especially since there seems to be little 'love' for Maualuga. Robiskie is supposed to be NFL-ready, and D. Stallworth's gonna be in jail at some point. As noted previously, the Browns feel that they can get some defenders later....I guess. But no draft upgrade to their pass rushers/linebackers (so far)? Must think they have some (Alex Hall?) help here and/or can get some later.

That's it for me. The Browns need some defenders with their remaining picks.

No comments: