Easy prediction (given current developments): Get ready for more, (organized) citizen actions such as this↓; ref. the (2014) video below. Those represented below -- plus many more -- have not "gone away". Nor will they...



(YT video link)

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
12/16 insert. (No affiliation.):



(YT video link)

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓(Previously written:)↓
Post-U.S. presidential election, 2016: Three items to (try to) keep front-and-center (article links below), if/when a U.S. administration generally hostile to the environment takes form. Off-site article links, no affiliation. New windows open:
http://time.com/4573414/climate-change-americas-cities/?


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/clean-energy-jobs-surpass-oil-drilling-for-first-time-in-u-s


http://www.lowcarbonusa.org/


**********************************************************************


5/4/16, Fort McMurray, Alberta, CN. (No affiliation with posting org.)

More info. here (off-site link): https://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurrayhttps://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurray

..Off-site news story excerpt (linked): "...Unseasonably hot temperatures combined with dry conditions have transformed the boreal forest in much of Alberta into a tinder box. Fort McMurray is surrounded by wilderness in the heart of Canada's oil sands..."

--> More about this (off-site article link, new window opens): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/science/global-warming-cited-as-wildfires-increase-in-fragile-boreal-forest.html?

More: (8/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4456011/california-wildfires-natural-disasters/?

More: (10/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4525178/climate-change-forest-fires/?

************************************************************************************************************************
************************************************************
7/26/16 off-site article link, new window opens:



*******************************************************************************
5/16: Hey...way, way more people check in with Jimmy Kimmel than this tiny blog. So, pls. have a listen (if you can get past Sarah...(Unnecessary bad language near the end of the video)):







(YT video link. No affiliation.)




***********************************************************************************************************

Climate change is not 'theoretical'. Effects are already occurring, in the United States. Today:

(Off-site 9/3/16 article link. New window opens. No affiliation:)



***************************************************************************************************





*******************************************************************************************************************

4/16 must-read: More fact than fiction...?

Off-site article link, new window opens: http://www.theonion.com/article/exxonmobil-ceo-relieved-it-finally-too-late-do-any-52732

**********************************************************************************************************************
3/16: Wake-up call ...yet another. ((If such projections are bolstered via add'l research:) Kids! 'Let's play pack-up and move to higher ground' (someday).):

(Off-site 3/30/16 article link, new window opens)

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/science/global-warming-antarctica-ice-sheet-sea-level-rise.html?

(3/31/16 editorial. Off-site link, no affiliation: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/opinion/the-danger-of-a-runaway-antarctica.html?)
************************************************************************************************************************


(↓Previous blog entries:)


(
Update (warning: contains facts/inevitable facts): 2015 is Earth's hottest year on record (off-site news article link).
2011-2015 is the warmest five-year period recorded (off-site article link).)
*******************************************************************************************************************************


(YT video link. No affiliation.)


>>>>Oh, please: ..How can puny mankind's activities possibly alter the Earth's environment..??




(YT video link)


...
on a global scale?? --> (one off-site link:) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141118-nasa-video-carbon-dioxide-global-warming-climate-environment/


***********************************************************

10/2015: 'Surprise'...Exxon understood about climate change -- through their own research -- back in the 1970s; supported misinformation about the concept for years after. Off-site 10/26/15 article link:


****************************************************************




(Related 11/30/15 article (link))


*****************************************************************************************


- "Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter
- "It is much easier at all times to prevent an evil than to rectify mistakes." - George Washington

- "97 percent of American scientists say that climate change is happening..." (link, new window)

- "Each of the last ten years features in the top 11 warmest years recorded in all [primary monitoring agency] datasets." (12/10 article link, table)

- "How hot was it? 2013 joins the top ten for temperatures..." (link)

- "... 'Flat Earth Society'? - Kerry slams climate change skeptics" (link)

- Risk management: "Even if it somehow could be determined that it is a coin flip -- 50/50 -- that 97% of climate scientists are (essentially) correct re climate change (link), don't present-day inhabitants (still) have the (moral) obligation to effectively address as much of the issue as is safely possible?
I.e.: Too great of a risk to future generations to ignore.. Or to paralyze with excessive deliberation." -- Anonymous



- "I'm not sure what the 'height of insanity' might be, but this seems a candidate: Modern, advanced societies ignoring - or deliberately distorting - principal findings of climate scientists -- who the same civilizations train and educate to become experts ..." (P.S. If it needs stating, we know what one of the 'rea$on$' (i.e., for denying) is...)
-- Anonymous





and,

- "...I have a better idea: do something, Congress. Do anything to help working Americans. Join the rest of the country. Join me, I'm looking forward to working with you...." --- President Barack Obama (7/2014)

9/2014: Also..."BP Plc Held Grossly Negligent for 2010 spill..."(article link). Appeals will be coming, but (if interested) you'll find a few older posts from a few years ago here, discussing the 'negligent ones' and certain attempts to deflect blame/responsibility.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Update: Browns' NFL draft

4/24/09: My April 22, twenty-something paragraph post analyzing the Cleveland Browns' upcoming NFL draft contained plenty of disclaimers. For good reason. As anticipated, it looks like some key things have changed in the last two days. (I'm sure not the last of the changes and surprises.)

-- Braylon Edwards may not be traded, at least to the NY Giants. The teams are reported to be at an 'impasse'. We'll have to see about this one. It doesn't necessarily mean that Edwards won't be traded on, or after draft day. (Even still to the Giants.) But it may mean that this player trade isn't quite a "sure thing". That said, I'm not changing my previous analysis/guesses completely, though I have some big changes at pick #5, below: Cleveland may still be interested in drafting a receiver in the second round or later. But, if no lower first round pick is obtained (from Edwards) it increases the likelihood of Cleveland either: Drafting a defender at selection #5, trading the pick down a few for additional picks (and then still taking a defender), or picking Mark Sanchez (if available....Seattle?) and then perhaps trading him for additional picks. It also makes me think that Cleveland may have a lower first rounder available to them for a Brady Quinn trade. But as said in my previous post don't forget that Derek Anderson could be the one to go, probably for a second rounder. Watch this possibility especially if Detroit does not select Matthew Stafford.

I'm sure many Browns fans wouldn't really understand a scenario where Edwards perhaps stays, Quinn gets traded, Sanchez is drafted at #5 and kept; and Derek Anderson ends up the starting QB in 2009....

But otherwise (e.g., Sanchez drafted and not kept, Quinn traded), maybe Cleveland thinks Pat White or Brian Hoyer are legitimate future NFL QB possibilities.

-- DT BJ Raji seems to be getting more prominent mention (from a few sources) for Cleveland's no. 5 selection. And a recent name, DE Tyson Jackson is supposedly moving up fast and could be an option for KC at #3, or the Browns. (Though I haven't read much of anything about Cleveland being interested.) If Jackson goes to KC, it may increase chances that Aaron Curry and/or a top OT could be available for the Browns. But there's still much talk of KC making a trade, too.

-- A bit more speculation about Cleveland going for a center at some point (after pick #5) has surfaced. Alex Mack and Eric Wood are two names mentioned.

--I don't think Cleveland may like S Louis Delmas as much as I indicated. If they're looking for a safety in round 2, they may go for bigger William Moore or perhaps Patrick Chung, as guesses. Also, I'm no longer sure that Connor Barwin would be available beyond late round 1/early round 2. Otherwise, at this point too much depends on possible trades to be able to accurately project the Browns' second round picks and beyond.

Winding it up: I may regret this, but I'm going to update/change my probabilities (guesses) for the Browns pick at #5, understanding that only Coach Mangini and GM Kokinis might have an idea at this point. (Not sure they do either, at least until right before the first pick.) And also, that things depend upon what other teams do and who the Browns end up trading (and with whom):

1. Raji 2. Sanchez 3. Tyson Jackson 3a. Curry 5. M. Crabtree 6. Trade pick down 7. Orakpo


As said previously, no one really knows right now. We'll see what unfolds beginning tomorrow.

No comments: