Easy prediction (given current developments): Get ready for more, (organized) citizen actions such as this↓; ref. the (2014) video below. Those represented below -- plus many more -- have not "gone away". Nor will they...



(YT video link)

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
12/16 insert. (No affiliation.):



(YT video link)

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓(Previously written:)↓
Post-U.S. presidential election, 2016: Three items to (try to) keep front-and-center (article links below), if/when a U.S. administration generally hostile to the environment takes form. Off-site article links, no affiliation. New windows open:
http://time.com/4573414/climate-change-americas-cities/?


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/clean-energy-jobs-surpass-oil-drilling-for-first-time-in-u-s


http://www.lowcarbonusa.org/


**********************************************************************


5/4/16, Fort McMurray, Alberta, CN. (No affiliation with posting org.)

More info. here (off-site link): https://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurrayhttps://twitter.com/hashtag/FortMcMurray

..Off-site news story excerpt (linked): "...Unseasonably hot temperatures combined with dry conditions have transformed the boreal forest in much of Alberta into a tinder box. Fort McMurray is surrounded by wilderness in the heart of Canada's oil sands..."

--> More about this (off-site article link, new window opens): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/science/global-warming-cited-as-wildfires-increase-in-fragile-boreal-forest.html?

More: (8/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4456011/california-wildfires-natural-disasters/?

More: (10/16 off-site article link) http://time.com/4525178/climate-change-forest-fires/?

************************************************************************************************************************
************************************************************
7/26/16 off-site article link, new window opens:



*******************************************************************************
5/16: Hey...way, way more people check in with Jimmy Kimmel than this tiny blog. So, pls. have a listen (if you can get past Sarah...(Unnecessary bad language near the end of the video)):







(YT video link. No affiliation.)




***********************************************************************************************************

Climate change is not 'theoretical'. Effects are already occurring, in the United States. Today:

(Off-site 9/3/16 article link. New window opens. No affiliation:)



***************************************************************************************************





*******************************************************************************************************************

4/16 must-read: More fact than fiction...?

Off-site article link, new window opens: http://www.theonion.com/article/exxonmobil-ceo-relieved-it-finally-too-late-do-any-52732

**********************************************************************************************************************
3/16: Wake-up call ...yet another. ((If such projections are bolstered via add'l research:) Kids! 'Let's play pack-up and move to higher ground' (someday).):

(Off-site 3/30/16 article link, new window opens)

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/science/global-warming-antarctica-ice-sheet-sea-level-rise.html?

(3/31/16 editorial. Off-site link, no affiliation: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/opinion/the-danger-of-a-runaway-antarctica.html?)
************************************************************************************************************************


(↓Previous blog entries:)


(
Update (warning: contains facts/inevitable facts): 2015 is Earth's hottest year on record (off-site news article link).
2011-2015 is the warmest five-year period recorded (off-site article link).)
*******************************************************************************************************************************


(YT video link. No affiliation.)


>>>>Oh, please: ..How can puny mankind's activities possibly alter the Earth's environment..??




(YT video link)


...
on a global scale?? --> (one off-site link:) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141118-nasa-video-carbon-dioxide-global-warming-climate-environment/


***********************************************************

10/2015: 'Surprise'...Exxon understood about climate change -- through their own research -- back in the 1970s; supported misinformation about the concept for years after. Off-site 10/26/15 article link:


****************************************************************




(Related 11/30/15 article (link))


*****************************************************************************************


- "Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter
- "It is much easier at all times to prevent an evil than to rectify mistakes." - George Washington

- "97 percent of American scientists say that climate change is happening..." (link, new window)

- "Each of the last ten years features in the top 11 warmest years recorded in all [primary monitoring agency] datasets." (12/10 article link, table)

- "How hot was it? 2013 joins the top ten for temperatures..." (link)

- "... 'Flat Earth Society'? - Kerry slams climate change skeptics" (link)

- Risk management: "Even if it somehow could be determined that it is a coin flip -- 50/50 -- that 97% of climate scientists are (essentially) correct re climate change (link), don't present-day inhabitants (still) have the (moral) obligation to effectively address as much of the issue as is safely possible?
I.e.: Too great of a risk to future generations to ignore.. Or to paralyze with excessive deliberation." -- Anonymous



- "I'm not sure what the 'height of insanity' might be, but this seems a candidate: Modern, advanced societies ignoring - or deliberately distorting - principal findings of climate scientists -- who the same civilizations train and educate to become experts ..." (P.S. If it needs stating, we know what one of the 'rea$on$' (i.e., for denying) is...)
-- Anonymous





and,

- "...I have a better idea: do something, Congress. Do anything to help working Americans. Join the rest of the country. Join me, I'm looking forward to working with you...." --- President Barack Obama (7/2014)

9/2014: Also..."BP Plc Held Grossly Negligent for 2010 spill..."(article link). Appeals will be coming, but (if interested) you'll find a few older posts from a few years ago here, discussing the 'negligent ones' and certain attempts to deflect blame/responsibility.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Why can't the U.S. pay greater tribute like this? Canada's Highway of Heroes

Part of the repatriating of Canada's fallen heroes. (Note: "The 401" is a very busy highway near Toronto with many overpasses, where people gather to pay respect.):




This may have recently changed somewhat, but in the U.S. we (used to) "sneak" Iraq and Afganistan war casualties into Dover Air Force Base in the dead of night. Most ceremonies and honors are still held largely in private here.

The U.S. can learn a lot from it's Canadian friends and allies. (2/21/10: Except, it seems, in Olympic (prelims.) HOCKEY.)

"The Dover (DE) Highway of Heroes". (Or something similar. Even a route part or all the way from Dover to Arlington National Cemetary (for those who will be interred there). (2/23/10: Pls. see the end of this post for updated info.) A special railway train may be possible in that region as an alternative. For others, individual cities/states could also do something similar. I'm sure some smaller towns already include a procession....
Why can't that happen?  It should ....It stinks that something like it (i.e., a more public honoring of fallen soldiers) is not regularly done here. It is the least that we can do....






I'm doing a bit more research to learn more. But I'm going to send these YouTube videos with an electronic message to the Dpt. of Defense, my U.S. rep. or others, soon. (If possible.) I think that a public honor/tribute like this is a very good idea. (Please copy this blog post URL  if you wish and include it in a message as well, if you agree. Please include a link/URL for this post. Thank you.)

Update, 2/23/10. Please also see a further update detailed at the end of this post: I'm still researching the overall process for fallen U.S. personnel. Here is one link, describing "dignified transfer", from the "Air Force Mortuary Affairs Operation Center (at Dover, DE). As can be seen, the focus is upon dignified, solemn transfer of remains to designated (usually family) individuals, in an expeditious manner: http://www.mortuary.af.mil/library/dignifiedtransfer/index.asp

I understand the focus upon "dignified transfer". This earlier article (10/29/03) from defense.gov states:

"Out of respect for families' privacy, defense officials do not allow
arrival ceremonies for, or media coverage of deceased military
personnel returning to or departing from  Dover Air Force Base
or Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany, or any other site
where remains are transferred."

Policy has recently been changed to allow media access - upon consent from family or next-of-kin - to the arrival of soldiers' bodies at Dover. Here is a link to a Columbia Journalism Review article which provides greater details: http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/dover_behind_the_scenes.php

As I continue to investigate, I'll offer these (early) assertions:

1) In many cases, soldiers' remains appear to be quickly entrusted at Dover to next-of-kin. What happens after that is not yet clear, though it is likely that each family decides what to do next. I.e., funeral and burial arrangements. I'm sure in some cases the funeral etc. takes place in the soldiers' home town. Any processsion, honors, etc. would take place there. So at Dover AFB, it appears that remains are flown in (from overseas) and transferred to next-of-kin at the base itself, or other, additional transport arrangements are made - at least in some cases. (Need to do more research here.)

2) In the United States, the following armed forces service members are eligible for burial at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington,VA (partial list of eligibility follows). According to Google Maps, the distance by car from Dover, DE A.F.B. to Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia is a little more than 100 miles. At least half appears to be over more rural/suburban areas of Delaware and Maryland (Eastern Shore area). It of course becomes more urban nearing Washington, DC. The suggested route also passes through Annapolis, MD.
I think that anyone reading can see where I'm attempting to "go" with this. (Given the information above.) Note: The distance from the Canadian air base to the (Canadian) mortuary is about 100 miles, per the NBC News video report, above. So it appears that the motorcades there are traveling a similar (i.e., long) distance. I will try to learn more about how soldiers' remains may "usually" travel from Dover to Arlington.....if that's what happens, at least in some cases.


Partial list of eligibility for internment at Arlington Nat'l Cemetery:
  1. Any active duty member of the Armed Forces (except those members serving on active duty for training only).
  2. Any veteran who is retired from active military service with the Armed Forces.
  3. Any veteran who is retired from the Reserves is eligible upon reaching age 60 and drawing retired pay; and who served a period of active duty (other than for training). 
 Please note: The original portions of this post are copyrighted, 2010.
"Angler's Smilin' at You"

Additional, 2/23/10 updateThis overall issue apparently was discussed in the following 2/14/09 article by John Barry for Newsweek magazine (link) : http://www.newsweek.com/id/184772    
 Mr. Barry concludes with an interesting idea that I also like, at first glance: Fly fallen soldiers remains into Andrews AFB, Washington, DC, then perform an honor procession - similar to the Canadian one above - from Andrews to Dover, DE (AFB). (Mr. Barry notes that such a procession might even be routed near the White House.) Mr. Barry says that currently, remains are sent from Dover AFB to the soldier's hometown for a military funeral.

    No comments: